“A prenuptial agreement is a legally bind contract created by two people before they marry. In the prenuptial agreement the couple addresses such issues as the property bought into the marriage by each person and what the property rights of each will be should they divorce.”
Words. Sentences. Jargon. Phrases. Anecdotes. This is how we tell stories,
sometimes. So last week you may have encountered phrases like: “...roadmap for
the Commercialization of Petroleum Resources discovered in the country,” or “…framework
for achieving a harmonized commercialization plan for the development of the
discovered oil and gas resources in the country.” How did we get to all this
jargon?
Well, the oil companies operating in Uganda – at the moment – that is:
Total, CNOOC and Tullow had been negotiating with government on how to develop
our oil. In other words the oil companies and government had to agree on how
much oil will be refined, where it will be refined, who will finance the
refinery & pipeline, and other infrastructure needs. It took over a year to
agree on this considering that the oil companies had been opposed to a refinery
in Uganda. So finally, they agreed and signed. But so what if they signed? Does
it mean oil will start flowing soon? Can companies begin production? Well, no.
Here is what the MOU isn’t: The MOU doesn’t mean we know how
much fuel – once the refinery is complete - will cost. It also has nothing to
do with how much Uganda will earn in terms of oil revenues. It has nothing to
do with revenue management. Obviously, it will not determine the price of oil.
It is only a roadmap. In other words, this just paves the way
for Uganda to continue the process towards finally being an oil producing
country. It is also an indicator that our oil is commercially viable right now.
Remember the definition of a prenuptial agreement above? That is how I can
describe the MOU between government and the oil companies.
Only one company – CNOOC – has been issued a production license. [Note that all the three oil companies are equal partners in all the licensed areas in the albertine region, but CNOOC is the main operator – the in-charge – of the
area where a production license was issued - Kingfisher]. So yes, an MOU was signed, but no
new production licenses were issued. Total and Tullow still have to wait. A
production license is like a go ahead for companies to finally start “bringing
oil out of the ground.” Notably, it takes about five years – in Uganda – from the
time you’re issued a production license to finally start commercial production.
Secondly, the MOU points out the role of government and that
of the oil companies. The government's priority right now is to find the
majority stake investor – 60% - in the oil refinery. It is currently compensating
people occupying the 29square kilometers of land in Kabale Parish, Buseruka
Sub-county, Hoima District where the refinery will be located. It has also shortlisted six consortia to submit their proposals for the development of the refinery.The model and financing of the refinery will determine the cost and whether we’ll get more affordable fuel. One of the reasons government gives for its push for a refinery, is to the country of a petroleum import bill of US$1bn [2013].
For the oil companies, their role is to make sure oil
produced goes the refinery first, before it makes to the export pipeline. The export
pipeline is their business, not ours. Not quite. It is our business
too but we have the option of having a stake or not in pipeline. In other-words,
we do not have to sink tax-payers money in the pipeline, unlike the refinery.
A statement issued by government reads,
“The MOU requires the oil companies to support Government in its efforts to develop the refinery including public endorsement of the project. It also requires Government to provide support to the oil companies in acquiring approvals for studies and surveys for an export pipeline and to initiate discussions with neighbouring countries in relation to cross border frameworks for the pipeline.”
Tullow’s Jimmy Mugerwa issued this “public endorsement” in a
statement issued after the signing:
“The parallel framework of a crude export pipeline and a right-sized refinery that has been agreed on in this MOU provides that market certainty.”
Note the wording >> “right-sized refinery.” The size of
the proposed refinery, 60,000 barrels per day. Expected completion year: 2018.
The third point is that the MOU signing gives the oil
companies some sort of signal on whether to invest in this country or not.
Again, here is another quote from Mugerwa: “…conclusion of this MOU between us
and government is significant because the capital required to finance the
development of the upstream production facilities, the pipeline and the
refinery is in billions of dollars and the financial planning for the project
requires that there is a clear market destination for Uganda’s oil production
before a Final Investment Decision (FID) can be concluded.”
So, Total Uganda, CNOOC Uganda and Tullow Uganda
subsidiaries can now confidently march to their parent companies and say, “hey,
we’ve made progress, can we get some more money to invest in this country?”
This also – silently – is some assurance to the oil companies that they will
perhaps get production license considering that they’ve already signed an MOU. More
investment in Uganda means, our local suppliers get to win [some] contracts. A
possibility of some jobs – I’ll refrain from a particular figure – and then
infrastructure development.
What I can say, the MOU was signed, and meaning government and oil companies are reading from the same script. I can also say a roadmap can take as long as possible. We still have several unanswered questions especially on project costs, whether we need both a refinery and pipeline? What have the oil companies exactly committed to? What we need to watch closely is the current Public Finance Management Bill in parliament that indicates how revenue from petroleum is going to managed.
